Wednesday, March 7, 2007

The Fifth Column

Here is an interesting story about the the way Islam is going to attempt to usurp our constitution. The constitution and the sharia law are not compatible, the koran and the constitution are not compatible, the constitution and the Islam are not compatible. When are our dhim witted leaders going to wake up? This story comes from Storm Watch via the Religion of Peace.



Storm Track Infiltration: American Muslims Believe They Found A Way To Establish Shariah Law in the USA.
And while our attention is diverted by our clueless leaders and the apologists and appeasers of Islamism, this is what’s happening behind our backs. Issa Smith writes in the American Muslim that Native American courts can be used as a precedent for Islamic courts in the US.
Although the Muslim community in North America is vastly different from the Indian community, I feel that in developing a plan for the implementation of Muslim family law, we can in some ways imitate the paradigm of the tribal court system and its supporting network. In particular, I recommend that as a first step, supporting organizations dealing with Islamic family law be established immediately. A professional association of Muslims in the law field (of whatever specialty) is a must. A law school students’ support group should be formed, and Muslim youth should be encouraged to enter this field.A second step would be to establish institutes in the U.S. which can supplement legal education with courses in Islamic family law. At the same time, pressure should be put on law schools to include courses in Shariah taught by Muslims.Could they be any more blatant in their plans? It’s institutional jihad at its stealthiest.
An idea suggested in several quarters and being developed by the American Muslim Council, is the moot court where students and legal experts can act out Muslim family court scenarios.Hey America? Anybody home! Look! Wake up! What will it take before we understand that these supposed moderate Muslim organizations in this country are in league with the Islamists and are using the non-violent tactics of institutional, cultural, media, financial, demographic, economic, litigation jihads? When are we going to do anything about these traitorous organizations?
The process of implementing Muslim family law will not be accomplished overnight.How many times have we’ve been told that the Islamists are working on ‘Theocracy on the 100 years plan’?
Changes of their type take place very slowly in American society, and our community is far from being prepared for this task. I commend the continental council of Masajid for organizing this conference, and bringing together so many workers and thinkers. I pray to Allah the real decisions are made here that can be implemented by those ready to work. However, I strongly urge that consideration be given to political realities and the sensitivities of the American public.Right. Let’s not get the dhimmis too upset. They might catch on to something.
Such a radical change in American law—allowing Muslims to take control over their family law issues - must be initiated from the indigenous Muslim community here in the United States.Having Muslim politicians in office should go a long way in helping that come being. That was also one of the strategies of the Muslim Brotherhood Project and their 100 year plan.
To have it seem that this initiative is originating from overseas or from organizations financed overseas, would create a very negative impression that would likely destroy this effort. Unbelievable, huh? There it is in black and white. Is CNN on this? Yeah, right.
Sign up for my free WEEKLY STORM REPORT and receive a synopsis of the most important weekly news revealing the intimidation, infiltration and disinformation tactics used to soften-up the non-Muslim world for domination.

Monday, March 5, 2007

THE GENTILE RANTS: THE MEDIA

To begin with when I use the term media in this rant I mean news outlets. Television, radio, newspapers etc. I am no scholar on the media. I do not know of the "theory " behind the media other than it should be keeping people informed. I have this image in my mind of reporters, a Lois Lane looking lady or a Clark Kent looking guy looking for answers like a CSI. Scouring far and wide for the truth at their own risk, just to keep us informed of what is going on. Helping to keep our government transparent through tough questioning and not cowering to some arrogant agent of some unaccountable administration or squelching the truth for a price. In the USA millions of people depend on the media for information, they trust the media. They have the same image in their head about the media and reporters I do.
We all know that is not the media today. Media outlets are bought and paid for by people who want to forward their own agenda. I would hope that they would want to be honest and factually correct. One would think with many different owners there would be a large amount of real information to be pursued. What with Iraq, Iran , North Korea, China, an economy that appears to be headed for a downturn, an administration that is pushing all borders of legality etc at the national level. No that hardly warrants airtime, but WHOA! Anna Nichole Smith died and its’ a circus, lets make sure we get every sordid , grim little detail we can dig up, we can drag this out for two , maybe even three weeks or more. I am sorry she died and I mean no disrespect to the dead, but is this really an earth shattering event that requires in depth, over the top reporting to the masses? Instead of prying for the truth from the people who are undermining the laws of this nation, our lawmakers, the media would prefer to give them a pass and hound some dead womans family beyond all reality. I bet Anne Nicholes’ family and loved ones would have appreciated a pass on all of the incredibly in depth coverage, the airing of personal laundry etc. How about this as a story, "Why is a congressman who had $105,000 in cash( ill gotten gain) in his freezer still in congress? Not only that , he is about to be put on the "Homeland Security Committee" because he couldn’t make it in the "Ethics Committee"". WHAT!? I am quite sure I must be making this up. A real reporter wouldn’t let something this juicy go, would they? WHY ? This is "Political Correctness" at work, the situation doesn’t further the agenda, squelch the media,"It’s a non-story people , just keep moving , nothing to see here" Look, we are at war. Men are dying. Our administration has painted this nation into a corner on many issues including the war , they have NEVER been fully honest about exactly who our enemy is and why that enemy wants to kill us and the best the media can do is to drag out this girls untimely death. My guess is the truth just isn’t paying well these days for the media.( just like politics) They have to put something quick, kind of legitimate sounding out there, that somehow appears to be addressing what is happening in the world, just to keep up the appearance of legitimacy as a news outlet and keep those big checks rolling in. The real news is "cleansed " so as not to offend. The truth is edited into some meaningless blurb slipped into some obscure spot in a broadcast or newspaper, thats if it even makes it that far.( straw man media outlet)" Oh my, we just can’t mention that race or that religion or that country or men or women or what crime may have been committed or........" on and on. The political correctness drones on and on ad nauseam. Funny thing. It is not limited to one political party or another, or one group or association etc, it is everywhere. It is being pushed into every fiber of this nation. The engine, greed, the reward , money, the end result, our ultimate demise. Sad thing is that many of these people, the politically correct, own our media outlets and influence the political system, on both sides of the aisle, in places where they could make a difference. They choose not to make a difference. They bow to the almighty buck. If someone shows the money,( straw man media outlet) "what the heck we’ll make your pitch, even if it means stealing a little bit of America ."( straw man media outlet) "Oh you say you don’t want us to mention what...no problem the people will never know." I am waiting to see the spin on weather in the future.
There is a Saudi Arabian prince who bought into CNN, I believe he is the same one who offered Rudi Guilianni $10,000,000 after 9/11. This prince was watching when CNN broke the news about the riots in France, you know where the muslims rioted and looted and carried on like they do. CNNs headline read "Muslim riots". A phone call was made and the headline was changed. Interesting. It makes one wonder who is pulling what strings and to what end. What better method of reaching millions of people with false , misleading information than the media. I am saying if you are rich , you are in charge of the message. I am also saying do not equate financial wealth with morals. I am saying look at the people with money buying into the media, not just from this country, from all over the world, what could they possibly want to tell us. Why can’t they allow us to hear the truth. What benefit is there to distracting us from real world events with superfluous news of a young womans death. This is just one example of controlling the message and the usurping of freedom of speech, something that is happening over and over in this country. These are the people who own the media; While freedom of speech lies there dying they bring flowers instead of help. And if you think "there is always the blogosphere, its safe" , guess again. The European Union is trying take charge of the system that gives addresses to the internet in order to change protocol, all in order to squelch the truth. If they deem you offensive, it will be almost impossible for someone to access your blog or website, they will make it happen.
Freedom of speech, so important to a free nation, the journalists’ tool, is now being undermined by the people who utilize it as a business, people who should be defending it. Politicians are already on this page!

Friday, March 2, 2007

Racism by Statute

I realize in the previous post that some of the things I wrote could be taken as racist comments. Let me clarify, briefly, I am not now nor have I ever been a racist, nor do I have any intention of becoming a racist. When I write and speak about Islam I am speaking about an ideology, not any particular race( as muslims will tell anyone, muslims are from many nations and many races). I have been studying what is written in the koran, that is where my information comes from. Here are a few tidbits that muslims believe( remember, muhammed was the perfect example and his diety wrote the koran)


Ishaq:243 "I heard the Apostle say: ‘Whoever wants to see Satan should look at Nabtal!' He was a black man with long flowing hair, inflamed eyes, and dark ruddy cheeks…. Allah sent down concerning him: ‘To those who annoy the Prophet there is a painful doom." [9:61] "Gabriel came to Muhammad and said, ‘If a black man comes to you his heart is more gross than a donkey's.'"
Ishaq:144 "A rock was put on a slave's chest. When Abu Bakr complained, they said, ‘You are the one who corrupted him, so save him from his plight.' I will do so,' said Bakr. ‘I have a black slave, tougher and stronger than Bilal, who is a heathen. I will exchange him. The transaction was carried out."
Qur'an 9:97 "The Arabs of the desert are the worst in unbelief and hypocrisy, and most fitted to be in ignorance of the command which Allah hath sent down to His Messenger."
Tabari II:11 "Shem, the son of Noah was the father of the Arabs, the Persians, and the Greeks; Ham was the father of the Black Africans; and Japheth was the father of the Turks and of Gog and Magog who were cousins of the Turks. Noah prayed that the prophets and apostles would be descended from Shem and kings would be from Japheth. He prayed that the African's color would change so that their descendants would be slaves to the Arabs and Turks."
Tabari II:21 "Ham [Africans] begat all those who are black and curly-haired, while Japheth [Turks] begat all those who are full-faced with small eyes, and Shem [Arabs] begat everyone who is handsome of face with beautiful hair. Noah prayed that the hair of Ham's descendants would not grow beyond their ears, and that whenever his descendants met Shem's, the latter would enslave them."
Tabari IX:69 "Arabs are the most noble people in lineage, the most prominent, and the best in deeds. We were the first to respond to the call of the Prophet. We are Allah's helpers and the viziers of His Messenger. We fight people until they believe in Allah. He who believes in Allah and His Messenger has protected his life and possessions from us. As for one who disbelieves, we will fight him forever in Allah's Cause. Killing him is a small matter to us."
Bukhari: V9B89N256 "Allah's Apostle said, ‘You should listen to and obey your ruler even if he is a black African slave whose head looks like a raisin.'"
Ishaq:450 "It is your folly to fight the Apostle, for Allah's army is bound to disgrace you. We brought them to the pit. Hell was their meeting place. We collected them there, black slaves, men of no descent.
Ishaq:374 "The black troops and slaves of the Meccans cried out and the Muslims replied, ‘Allah destroy your sight, you impious rascals.'"
Bukhari:V4B52N137 "The Prophet said, ‘Let the negro slave of Dinar perish. And if he is pierced with a thorn, let him not find anyone to take it out for him.... If he [the black slave] asks for anything it shall not be granted, and if he needs intercession [to get into paradise], his intercession will be denied.'"

Wednesday, February 28, 2007

One of the Truths about slavery

I found the following article interesting personally because some of the conclusions that one never hears in schools or the media because not many people realize who pursued slavery as religiously as Islam did and still does. Slavery is not new and was not new when Islam was established, they just refined it and justified it through their "faith". What is more amazing is that any African or African American would even choose this religion by their own choice. A religion where the founder stated he was happy that Allah had made black people slaves. I realize the people in Africa probably do not get a choice( unless you consider "join or die" a choice), but people in America, who are free to choose? The anger that must still linger in people for them to choose Islam is scary, especially when you realize information and truth are out there if you just research. I copied the following article from "the religion of peace"


Islam and the Black Man Contact: Pastor George Saieg, Arabic Christian Perspective, 714- 448 -3820 cell, 866-533-6659

ONTARIO, Calif., Feb. 24 /Christian Newswire/ -- Former Sultan Ali El-Shariff and Pastor George Saieg, founder of Arabic Christian Perspective, will be available for interviews on Saturday March 3rd, 10:00am - 12:00pm at a to-be-announced location, call 866-533-6659 for details.

The following comments are from Pastor George Saieg, founder of Arabic Christian Perspective.

A Call for African Unity:
African Americans choose this day which side you are on. Will you side with your Black Sudanese brothers who are being killed in genocide of Holocaust proportions, or will you side with those who oppress them and who sold you into slavery?

Former Sultan Ali El-Shariff has forsaken Islam and his earthly kingdom to stand in unity with his Black African brothers. Will you join with him in calling for an end of the genocide, or will you join Islam, the religion that sold Black African Americans into slavery and is selling Black Sudanese into slavery today.
A Call for Christian Unity:
The Bible tells us that those who love the Lord are one body, and when one member of the body suffers, we all suffer too. Under the intense persecution mandated by Islam many faithful Christian martyrs have chosen death and suffering than denying Jesus as their Lord. Some Christians escaped death by paying a heavy tax, others loving this world rather than the next, renounced their faith under threat of death and became Muslims, damning themselves and their offspring to a dark existence. How painful it must have been for these weak apostates, to see their children grow up to be just like their misguided enemies.

This cycle can be broken, Ali El-Shariff was a Sultan in Sudan, but like Moses he left his earthly kingdom for a heavenly one, and like Moses he seeks to lead his people to freedom. Let us stand in support of our brother in his assault against the gates of Hell. Jesus promised that these gates could not stand against His church, let us therefore go forth boldly loving not our own lives and for the sake of our brothers and sisters endure all hardship.

Event Details:

Brother Ali El-Shariff will speak on Saturday March 3rd at 7:30pm at the Mt. Zion Baptist Church 224 West California Street, Ontario, CA 91762
The Former Sultan Ali El-Shariff and Pastor George Saieg founder of Arabic Christian Perspective will be available for interviews on Saturday March 3rd at 10:00am- 12:00pm, call for location.

The Gentile

Monday, February 26, 2007

THE GENTILE RANTS! THE BORDER? WHAT BORDER?

Before everything gets blown out of proportion, I am an immigrant, a card carrying member, totally legal and working on my citizenship ! O.K I admit it, I am from Europe I don’t count. The great thing about this nation is that I may not count as an immigrant to this societies’ standards, but I am still entitled to "free speech". Soooo.... I would like to know how a person, whose very first act inside this nation was to break the law, is entitled to a portion of the money I pay in taxes. Before I go too far let me make clear that this rant is not about people from other nations, it is about the people in this nation. I understand why people want to come to this nation. I love this country, this nation, the United States of America. It is a beautiful land, large, it feels free. The people are diverse and generally friendly and tolerant. I also know there are people who are coming here to harm this nation because they hate what it stands for, something they can never have, even if they lived here, freedom. This freedom was not achieved easily, it has cost a lot of blood , sweat and tears. . We have had leaders who stood up for this nation, who had integrity. We have had leaders lead this nation to the top , and sadly we have had leaders take us down the wrong path. It appears our "elite leaders" have decided over the recent years that maintaining the sovereignty of our nation was somehow "politically incorrect", somehow the people who are paying their salary don’t seem to matter once they are "hired" to their high paying , tax free , special privileges and moneys, position( maybe it’s the special money ! ). From top to bottom, our nations leaders are taking a pass on their responsibility to us. Their responsibility is to their constituents. Our national leaders refuse to show any kind of "bolas" when it comes to the issue of this nations sovereignty. I would like to hear just one more "expert " tell us how" if we don’t fight the terrorists over there ,we will have to fight them here". Knock knock knock, hello, news flash, the enemy is here. They are crossing the chalk line we call a border. Our border is not about depriving any particular race of people a better life, it is about protecting that better way of life, it is about protecting the ideals of this nation, freedom. Freedom of speech, freedom to worship, or not, freedom to travel where ever you want, freedom to work , to live and pursue happiness( or not ! ). Freedom for all! There are many people from all over the world who are illegally crossing our nations borders, whether by land or by sea. At this time it appears to be our southern border with Mexico that has the most activity( all of our borders need to be sealed). Sure we could blame Mexico and its’ people. We would be wrong. It is not just Mexicans and it is not their fault. We are not crossing their border, because if that were the case, it WOULD be their fault, they would have to stop it. The truth is , it is OUR border THEY are crossing, so WE have to stop it.( when I say they, I do not specifically mean only Mexicans, or even people from Central and South America, there are Asians and Africans and Arabs and Russians and terrorists). If we want to have control over our sovereignty we have to do whatever it takes. It is up to US ! We can stop it, if we want to. If you listen to our inept leaders "there is no way to stop it "or "it would be cost prohibitive"( right , the government is frugal). Look, the example has been set. Look back to "old" East and West Germany. What separated those two nations for all those years other than ideology. A fence. Not just a fence, a double fence with a wide path in between, with towers that had overlapping and clear views. with a well maintained dirt road running the entire length.( I am not going to recommend land mines, unless we go to war ! ). "Oh my we cannot militarize our border". HELLO! The border is already militarized, the smugglers have better weapons than our border patrol and law enforcement, they are brazenly attacking them and chasing them from their facilities. Militarize it, what better place to build Army and Air Force posts along with reservist bases. Why should anyone outside this nation have any say about where we station our military in our land. As long as we don’t plan on invading Mexico or Canada what harm can a fence and our military do. Hurt our neighbors feelings ? Sorry. I predict we will all get over this. I am asking our representatives to do the job we are paying them to do, protect the welfare and safety of the people who pay for everything. This is about keeping the enemy out , protecting our way of life and what is ours.